tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-600589111118264680.post6936725129723542692..comments2024-03-10T21:35:32.778+11:00Comments on 3++ is the new black. | Kirb your enthusiasm!: Email in: Alexander's 1750k tau... "Since everyone else is doing it..."Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07693773850422698445noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-600589111118264680.post-44747412742094220062010-03-05T22:35:56.804+11:002010-03-05T22:35:56.804+11:00As it is I think it's fine. If you wanted the ...As it is I think it's fine. If you wanted the extra Railhead over the Broadside I'd drop the FW/Fish unit which should give you 90 ish points left over so add 2 more Fireknives.<br /><br />As I said though I think it's okay as you've got the 2 fish which should compensate for the loss of the Railhead in relation to anti-infantry.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07693773850422698445noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-600589111118264680.post-49339171758222342822010-03-04T22:10:14.175+11:002010-03-04T22:10:14.175+11:00Thanks for that. The extra d-fish was an oversight...Thanks for that. The extra d-fish was an oversight: there were originally two FoF units in the army and the second took the PF's 'fish. Then I realised I was only really using FoF out of some strange 4th edition sentimentality and dropped a unit. <br /><br />After your changes, you wouldn't consider the list too static? I'm liking it a lot but I'm wondering if it will suffer from the same mobility problems the old list did. Might dropping a broadside and some fireknives for another railhead do any good?<br /><br />Cheers,<br />PolyPolymphusnoreply@blogger.com