I had another e-mail this year about the UK Masters so here it goes. Again, I know nothing of the players and how good or not so good they are and am doing this critique based upon their armies. This isn't a personal attack or saying anyone or anything is bad but an objective review on the armies they are using.
So first, the tournament rules. There are still two army lists and the organisers are expecting two distinct and different armies - no idea why people would do this and it just throws a spanner into the works where none is needed. We're now testing your ability to have a list which can scale from 1500 to 1750 and play equally well at both levels unless you really want to carry around two armies.
