--------------
Andy,
I read your article today and one thing I was wondering was the decision made to move to resin in response to the increased cost in metal or was it because the models are more detailed? I don't mind paying slightly more for my models since the quality is better.
However, what concerns me is how "marketing speak" this article came across as. I work in the web marketing industry and I deal with announcements and such and I have to say this whole article feels like "fluff." Your customers are very smart people (they have to be to understand the game rules afterall!) and articles like this one make me angry because I feel I am being talked down to. I understand the resin models are higher quality but there is no mention of the 200% increase in the raw cost of tin or anything of that nature. I think not including that does a great disservice to your customers because we care about your company and how your business is run. Reading this article makes me feel that Citadel and Games Workshop is only about profit and not reacting to the changing world economy. I hope this changes in the future.
Sincerely,
Ben Hoffman
--------------
Hey Ben,
Yes, I would agree, most of yesterday’s article was very ‘marketing speak’. This was for a couple of reasons. I do a lot of the blog posts for the site, but I haven’t had much experience with Citadel Finecast as yet. As a result, we decided to let the Studio team write the post, seeing as they know all about it. We wanted the post to be the official message out to people, about the quality of the models and how it will benefit you, the customer. When it comes down to it, there are a lot of reasons behind the change. Yes, metal is becoming more expensive (especially tin) but we didn’t feel that it was relevant to the article. Our goal is to make the best quality miniatures, not the most cost effective (resin may be cheaper than tin alloy, but boy does it take more effort to work with, not to mention re-casting every mould for every model now in resin). We wanted to try and stay away from that sort of stuff though. I know, as a hobbyist myself that I would be interested in that kind of thing, but many others wouldn’t be. The idea was a nice, simple message about the positives of the new kits. What I would say though, is that I really appreciate your email. It helps explain a few of the concerns that people out there might have that we may not be addressing. I will pass this message on.
If you have any further thoughts, feel free to email us and I will pass them on.
Dan
--------------
Dan,
I really appreciate the response and that does shed a lot of light on the process. If I could suggest one thing, maybe you could post a technical/history of the Finecast Project. There is a big part of the community that would like to know how you guys decided on Finecast, how you had to recast the moulds, and the extra difficulties casting in resin creates (hence the increased costs). I have read a number of blog and forum posts online discussing whether you re-cast the moulds or not and the consensus seems to be that a retool was done and not a re-cast. Also, I reviewed the models that have been re-cast and they seem to be newer castings. Is there any high level plan for re-cast or new resin casts for extremely old metal models (like Tycho or Logan Grimnar)?
Finally, would it be alright if I forwarded this email on to one or two of the major Warhammer blog sites out there? I think the items you addressed added clarity to the Finecast process and will probably calm some of the head scratching over the price increases.
Ben
I really appreciate the response and that does shed a lot of light on the process. If I could suggest one thing, maybe you could post a technical/history of the Finecast Project. There is a big part of the community that would like to know how you guys decided on Finecast, how you had to recast the moulds, and the extra difficulties casting in resin creates (hence the increased costs). I have read a number of blog and forum posts online discussing whether you re-cast the moulds or not and the consensus seems to be that a retool was done and not a re-cast. Also, I reviewed the models that have been re-cast and they seem to be newer castings. Is there any high level plan for re-cast or new resin casts for extremely old metal models (like Tycho or Logan Grimnar)?
Finally, would it be alright if I forwarded this email on to one or two of the major Warhammer blog sites out there? I think the items you addressed added clarity to the Finecast process and will probably calm some of the head scratching over the price increases.
Ben
--------------
Hey Ben,
I don’t see any problem with posting it, though remember that my comments are in answer to your email, so probably best to post them together or they will be out of context. With regards to the whole process of the Finecast, I have no idea if we’ll show the process. I, like others out there, have an interest in that sort of thing (I like technical stuffs) but I’m sure there are plenty more who wouldn’t find it interesting at all. I’ll pass the message on and see if there’s any support for it. Oh, and yes, all of the new miniatures had a new cast made, it’s not a re-tooling of the old one (for one thing, the old one used molten metal, the new one uses resin). As for re-casts of older models, yes, Logan will be on the shelves on Saturday morning (his beard looks awesome), though Tycho will not be yet.
Hope that answers your question.
Dan
--------------
Discuss and thanks Ben for bringing this to our attention.
Autarch79 · 722 weeks ago
Wait - are you saying that maybe they do in fact have greater detail? That I have observed better quality in models?
Hunh.
VT2 79p · 722 weeks ago
In other words, finecast are mostly recasts - which is a far superior name.
Cheapcast could work, too, since they're doing this to cut their own costs.
Autarch79 · 722 weeks ago
What's wrong with them using the original master to make a new mold? If anything I would think using resin on the original master would enable them to capture more detail.
That doesn't make finecasts recasts. Any copy you make of the original isn't a recast - it's the first copy of the original. A copy of a copy is a recast.
VT2 79p · 722 weeks ago
Look at Abaddon. He's suffering from severe 'old as the Bible' technology, and was clearly made to be cast in metal. He doesn't have those spikes, blades, or any gear you could theoretically cast these days in metal (dark eldar archon), nor all that much detail on the main portion, unlike others (Draigo). He certainly wasn't meant to be made in resin, since he's small, conservatively built (almost like the mould doesn't have a lot of space to work with...), and is generally very 2d. This is something that you get with these old, old models, from before they'd invented CAD.
Riddle me this: if you take a master from the olden days, and use it to create a mould for a new material, without improving anything, what do you call that?
When they DO get around to making models for the resin casting, using the actual advantages of the material and the moulding process, we'll know what they're capable of.
Until then, we have a really huge pile of miscast metal figures (now in resin) with a silly mark-up, and some rather good things (my Draigo) to go with.
It doesn't look promising so far.
HurricaneGirl · 722 weeks ago
VT2 79p · 722 weeks ago
It's one of those disadvantages the material just comes with.
Sean C · 722 weeks ago
VT2 79p · 722 weeks ago
Lord Sandwich · 722 weeks ago
@EveryoneVSme · 722 weeks ago
Brother Captain Ed · 722 weeks ago
Hefe13 1p · 722 weeks ago
Which stinks because I was interested in picking up a commissar or commissar lord soon :/
Dalinair · 722 weeks ago
Nick · 722 weeks ago
Furthermore I am from Germany and the prices over here are more than expensive.
The price for Abbaddon e.g. is 20,25 Euro.
Castellan Crowe 15 Euro.
Land Raiders 52 Euro and the next price increase has been announced lately.
Besides of that Finecast got 2 pros:
1. Weight
2. More resistant if they tip or fall.
eadipus · 722 weeks ago
I was planning on doing a comparison between my Finecast Draigo, metal Castellan Crowe and resin Hector Rex as they're all very detailed GK models.
@bryce963 · 722 weeks ago
One of the guys standing around talking about it had the best and most depressing advice I've heard so far about how to live in our new Finecast world. "Lower your expectations."
It just shocks me that GW would purposefully go from having the best looking miniatures, on an army scale, to this crap that is malformed and warped most of the time it seems. I know it's all about money, but still, I would rather pay more than put up with things that I can't use. It's a pain in the ass the return things ordered online, if you are even able to at all.
The last store to sell GW stuff in town closed yesterday, now I can only get product off a shelf when I travel back home. I hope I don't need any more single or would have been metal models, there is no way I would buy any finecast without getting to look at it first.
MC Tic Tac · 722 weeks ago
Alas to say none of the Vets or anyone over 4 Customer wise liked him.