
So I have been getting pressure to make some serious changes to Centurion by the WargamerAU community. Now we usually laugh at WGAU as the request you expect is "put comp back in".
I then spoke to some locals, SneakyDan (another 3++ Author) and a few plebs, and it seems that there has been some backlash over the idea of Combat Patrol...
What this means, is that for me to get a decent turnout @ Centurion its time to trim the fat, and lose the Combat Patrol.
(Taak, don't hurt me... in fact... you get no say. You aren't even registered yet!)
So what this ends up meaning for all you players out there ( and this will be whacked up around and about the internet, look forward to seeing it on 3++ in about, oh, 24 hours), is that I will be copying what the NOVA is doing this year.
Re-seeding the event into brackets at the end of Day 1.
So this means, for 64 players, I end up with 16 x 4 player brackets:
1x 4/0
4 x 3/1
6 x 2/2
4 x 1/3
1x 0/4
(Maths will be wrong here, but too lazy to fix)
What this means is that inside your 'bracket' you should have 2 close, competitive games with people of your own skill level. What this also means is that we will end up with one person who does not win a game all weekend. This person will take home the Combat Patrol's original prize, the Forgeworld Tau Suit.
Can I get your thoughts and some ideas on how you, as mainly friends or prospective attendees, feel about this?
It works out to being the same amount of effort on my part, and the joy is that we can also let the players run their own 4 player "event".
We can assign the players the Game 5 matches, and their partnering pair, winners play winners, losers play losers, come see me in 2 games time!
GreyICE · 747 weeks ago
- 4 games. 8 opponents is 3 games, 4 is 2. 3 games gives people time to drive home, but more games is better, amright?
- More fun. If you lose your 4th game in a nailbiter, you still might get into a 'better' bracket. This is cool, and fun, rather than "I lost game 3, I'm in 'bad bracket.'"
- Less silly. Really, 16 brackets? What are you going to name them all? Even 8 is a challenge.
- Less randomness. Everyone loses a game that's close to a slightly worse opponent. Dice are dice Does that mean they're automatically not worthy of winning? If they aren't, they won't make it through 3 tough games anyway.
fester40k 73p · 747 weeks ago
This way its "open" on Day 1, Day 2 is "your own little group".
Much easier on the brain than having the 4th game on Day 1 being part 1 of the 2nd thingy
GreyICE · 747 weeks ago
fester40k 73p · 747 weeks ago
This is why,
GreyICE · 747 weeks ago
fester40k 73p · 747 weeks ago
It's like having a BP tourney and allowing 1 and 2 to play off "just in case"
GreyICE · 747 weeks ago
Kirby 118p · 747 weeks ago
SageoftheTimes 77p · 747 weeks ago
fester40k 73p · 747 weeks ago
As it turns out, bad idea.
SageoftheTimes 77p · 747 weeks ago
Kirby 118p · 747 weeks ago
For example with 32 players after 3 games we get
4 3-0
12 2-1
12 1-2
4 0-3
The top 4 go into the gold bracket to play for the Centurion prize, then top 4 2-1s go into the silver bracket and the next top 4 2-1s go into the Bronze bracket. Top being based upon the 'overall' score which I don't recall how you are working that out. The rest of the field (20 odd) plays in a normal tournament setting for day2 based upon the overall score.
Auretious Taak · 747 weeks ago
It doesn't bother me what you do to be honest. And WGAU (it's spelt WAU!!!) is actually fairly decent when it comes to the community commenting about tournaments themselves, as opposed to whinging about comp scores et al (though more people are turninga round with the attitude of 'fuck the comp score, bring it anyways!' which is always nice). Not registered...no say...*shakes fist*
ComradeCowboy · 747 weeks ago
But... there's a part of me that knows it'll probably be me.
When do reservations close?
Also, Jeanstealer still going ahead?
fester40k 73p · 747 weeks ago
Registration AND payment AND lists close 30th January 2011
Kirby 118p · 747 weeks ago
Cyklown 51p · 747 weeks ago
That being said, only getting in 6 games kinda fucks you something fierce. Swiss pairings are really a much better way to go. It eats more time, but it gets you closer to double elim, which means that it takes a chunk of bad luck to actually screw you. But, hey, you don't have time for 7-8 games. Still, if you could... more games, with ranking based games and a really solid tiebreaker system is the way to go.
fester40k 73p · 747 weeks ago
As it is, most Aus tourneys are 2 days, 3 games day 1, 2 day 2, so 4/2 is going to be a push to begin with.
I wish I could do 3/3, i really do